Donate Now
Sunday, August 9, 2020
Donate Now
Home News Break free from the Twitter censors and come into the Parler

Break free from the Twitter censors and come into the Parler

-


TO anyone active on political social media, the increasing frustration and anger in recent months at Big Tech’s more and more overt censorship, in various forms, of conservative, classical-liberal and libertarian opinion should come as no surprise.

It’s been there in subtle ways ever since the 2016 votes for Brexit and Trump. But it’s in the last three months or so that the acceleration of Twitter in particular into a cesspit of predominantly Remainer, Left and woke grievance and vituperation seems to have exploded – especially with our own December 2019 election, Covid-19, the imminence of full and final Brexit, and the explosion of hard-Left Black Lives Matter/Antifa violent protest.

To give just a few of the more prominent examples, Twitter has taken upon itself to start what it disingenuously describes as ‘fact-checking’ Trump tweets which are political rhetoric or opinion rather than factual; but it doesn’t do the same to his political opponents. It’s permanently banned, among others, Father Ted creator Graham Linehan for tweeting ‘men aren’t women’; but the militant trans agenda gets a free pass.

Closer to home, earlier this year it suspended Tory backbench MP Sir Bill Cash, who has been involved with regular TCW contributor David Keighley of News-Watch on a judicial review of the BBC’s adherence to the impartiality requirements of its charter.

No reason was given for the suspension, imposed for allegedly ‘violating Twitter’s rules’, although the platform refused to say which rules had allegedly been violated or how. (The suspension has since been lifted.)

Whether one agrees or disagrees with the political opinions of all three is immaterial. The real test of our belief in free speech is whether we uphold and defend it, not just for the people and speech we do agree with, but also for the people and speech we don’t agree with. 

On that criterion, Twitter’s actions against Trump, Linehan and Cash were not only authoritarian and illiberal in their own right; they were moreover hypocritical and biased, in that Twitter indulges and tolerates equally questionable speech from their opponents.       

Nor is the censorship confined to prominent people.  Small-C conservative, classical-liberal or libertarian tweeters report being subjected to any or all of straightforward follower attrition, the more insidious shadowbanning – whereby Twitter seems to restrict the reach of accounts and make them hard to find – and artificial lowering of the number of Retweets or Likes on tweets popular with their followership.

Twitter relieved me of about 1,000 followers almost overnight in late 2018 for reasons that were, and remain, unclear.  Since then, my rate of follower acquisition has been a fraction of what it was before that reduction, and I’ve now lost count of the Direct Messages from people telling me that Twitter had arbitrarily unfollowed them from me so that my tweets just disappeared from their feeds, and how it had been very hard for them to find me again in order to re-follow.

Below are the monthly changes in my followership over the past 15 months:

Apr-19:    + 77Sep-19:    + 122Feb-20:   + 101
May 19:   +75Oct-19:    + 132Mar-20:  + 66
Jun-19:    + 86Nov-19:   – 68Apr-20:    – 7
Jul-19:     + 31Dec-19:   + 44May-20:   – 49
Aug-19:   + 41Jan-20:    + 67Jun-20:   – 96

Notice the abrupt change in the last three months, just as concerns about Twitter’s flagrant Left bias seem to have really accelerated exponentially? The fascinating metrics from the analytics, though, are that visits to the account’s profile are roughly 20 per cent down (because it’s being made difficult to find?), while the number of engagements/impressions is substantially up.

Twitter also seems to be promoting Left-viewpoint tweets up the order on subject or hashtag searches. Although I’m no fan of Boris Johnson or his ‘Conservative’ Party, this is especially noticeable on major setpieces such as Prime Minister’s Questions, or a significant speech or intervention by a conservative politician.

Amid the increasing frustration at all this, just over two weeks ago – like many others then and since – I joined the alternative platform Parler, with its absolute commitment to non-censorship and free speech. 

Parler reportedly had 300,000 new sign-ups from UK Twitter users alone over the weekend of June 21-22, growing from one million to 1.5million users in only a week. 

Although the Parler user interface is still somewhat clunky, and the platform could benefit from a few improvements, it’s nevertheless perfectly functional. 

A big plus is the 1,000-character limit, which is much better than Twitter’s 280. That often means only one post rather than what, on Twitter, would require a two or three tweet thread.

Although I know of one or two users who have junked Twitter accounts with over 25,000 followers to move across completely, most still have both running in parallel for the moment.

In contrast to Twitter’s shadow-banning and sometimes outright censoring of conservative views, not to mention steady erosion of followers, the early Parler impression is so far living up to its free speech reputation.

Although an initial surge obviously isn’t representative, acquiring 1,100 followers in only 11 days is nevertheless a satisfying contrast to the last 18 months on Twitter. Many familiar, reciprocal-follow faces from Twitter are there; one of the pleasures of the last two weeks’ experience has been finding a new raft of them every day, including some of social media’s best ‘climate-change’ sceptics.

The more supercilious elements of the Left-‘liberal’ elite Establishment’s mainstream media – conveniently ignoring the number of centre-Right and even centrist MPs and journalists using the platform – are already trying falsely to portray Parler as merely a safe-space echo-chamber for ‘far-Right’ ‘hate speech,’ https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/social-media-cesspit-gets-bigger-not-better-kfrtrck0q, though evidently based on a highly selective and partisan representation relying on only one or two examples https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/parler-katie-hopkins-and-laurence-fox-flee-to-twitters-anything-goes-rival-9kkm2d58m. It suggests that Parler might have them worried. 

You will find there not only me, but some of my fellow writers at The Conservative Woman:

·        TCW itself as @TheConWom

·        Co-Editor Kathy Gyngell as @KathyConWom

·        Karen Harradine as @KarenHWriter

·        Andrew Cadman as @Andrewccadman

·        and Yours Truly as @LibertarianRebel

Come and join us.   

Editor’s noteThe Conservative Woman will be adding a Parler ‘button’ on its Home Page and individual post pages as soon as possible.

- Advertisement -

If you appreciated this article, perhaps you might consider making a donation to The Conservative Woman. Unlike most other websites, we receive no independent funding. Our editors are unpaid and work entirely voluntarily as do the majority of our contributors but there are inevitable costs associated with running a website. We receive no independent funding and depend on our readers to help us, either with regular or one-off payments. You can donate here. Thank you.

Michael St George
Michael St George
Michael St George is a freelance writer arguing for minimal-state, low-tax, free-markets minarchist-libertarianism. He tweets as @A_Liberty_Rebel. He is @LibertarianRebelon Parler.

Support Us

Support the Conservative Woman
Click here

Like The Conservative Woman? Donate to help cover our costs

Sign up for The ConWom News

Each morning we send The ConWom Daily with links to our latest news. This is a free service and we will never share your details.